October 2010
95 posts
Joanne McNeil, “Just Tumbling,” Tomorrow Museum.
(I have a slavish-stalkerish love for the way Joanne McNeil writes about online discourse).
![]()
Ooh! Or should I say, boo! (cringe). An article featuring one of my favorite websites/collections, the Brooklyn-based Morbid Anatomy, from Newsweek!
In late October, millions adorn their homes with replicas of disembodied heads, or hang bloodied scarecrows by the neck from the branches of trees. White picket fences become cemetery gates, and nice suburban parents smile as their children ramble around miniature graves, sucking on Jell-O shaped like brains.
Artifice is one thing. But some people, either by accident or design, find themselves in possession of much more macabre objects than plastic Halloween decorations. This week a woman shopping at Goodwill found a lovely oak box that when opened, revealed what appeared to be human remains. (Goodwill says it has received urns in the past, which are usually marked with the name of the mortuary where the remains were cremated. In those cases, Goodwill returns the ashes to the mortuary..).
Todd Sieling, Manifesto for Slow Blogging.
Wow, this whole thing is brilliant and totally makes me check myself. It’s pretty antithetical to the whole Tumblr ethos, but there’s room for both Tumblr and slow blogging in a person’s life, I think. Maybe. Maybe not? Regardless, I need to move back towards the latter approach.
Caroline Picard, “The Existential Crisis of APT Galleries and Art”
http://lanternprojects.com/daily/?p=7832
(via sidecargallery)
I think James Franco is the new Ethan Hawke. I remember back when Ethan Hawke sorta mattered he used to do artsy kinds of things that didn’t quite fit into the movie star mold and he, too, tended to be ridiculed by others for his pretensions. Whatever. Who cares about James Franco. Hey read this:
![]()
I am always on the lookout for good rants, but lots of the best ones aren’t contemporary art-related and thus aren’t appropriate for posting on Bad at Sports. Although its author, Jeffrey Sconce, might disagree with my labeling this post as a rant, I think it does qualify, mostly for wicked funny passages like this one:
If you want to get angry, get angry that anyone had to make a “choice” of any kind in this scenario. Mad Men is politically “bad” in some sense because it paired Don with the young French hottie over the age-appropriate professional peer, and yet there is little interrogation as to the imperative of heteronormative monogamy that demands Don must legally pair up with something in a skirt by season’s end. If one is going to play the weird game of judging fake people living in cartoons of distant historical eras by the yardstick of contemporary gender politics, shouldn’t we be more riled by the unexamined logic that all of them—Don, Megan, and Faye—can only be happy if they get married and squirt out a few more Nassau County trust fund kids for the 1980s?
Hah. And the post is long and kind of crazy-rambling, which also puts it into the rant category. Don’t get me wrong: it’s incredibly well-written and very, very funny; an all-around good piece of television/cultural critique. I do enjoy my regular doses of Ludic Despair. If you’ve read this far, click the link above and go read the whole piece!
![]()
From On the Make:
What does it mean to characterize an artist by where they live and work? And similarly, what does it mean for a collection to be of a place—to reflect a museum’s history and artistic community, to be shaped by the dynamics of a city, to be used by and be seen as part of the locale where it lives?
The MCA’s new James W. Alsdorf Chief Curator Michael Darling, artist and writer Michelle Grabner, and critic Lane Relyea delve into these questions, looking at examples from the United States and internationally. A book signing of the just-released publication Can I Come Over to Your House? The First Ten Years of The Suburban follows the talk. The book features essays by Forrest Nash and Michael Newman. Design by Jason Pickleman.